LRWMM
A dynamic bankroll management framework for DeFi casinos that adjusts risk exposure and wager limits based on real-time liquidity conditions, ensuring sustainable growth and on-chain stability.
Introduction
The Liquidity Responsive Wager Management Model (LRWMM) is a foundational risk management mechanism designed for decentralized gaming protocols. Unlike traditional bankroll strategies, such as the Kelly Criterion, that depend on probabilistic optimization, LRWMM ties wager sizing directly to the available liquidity pool and system-defined risk parameters.
In decentralized environments, the liquidity pool functions as the casino’s on-chain bankroll. Its value fluctuates dynamically as wagers are placed, games resolve, and users add or withdraw funds. LRWMM ensures that wager sizes remain proportionate to total liquidity, maintaining both solvency and player confidence.
This model introduces a liquidity-dependent exposure formula, which determines the maximum permissible wager per game round. It accounts for variables such as payout multipliers, volatility tolerance, and reserve ratios, dynamically recalibrating as liquidity conditions evolve.
By anchoring betting limits to the liquidity pool’s state, LRWMM offers:
Sustainable bankroll growth aligned with liquidity scaling.
Automatic risk moderation under high volatility or low liquidity conditions.
Smart contract compatibility, enabling on-chain, real-time limit recalculation.
This approach creates a mathematically transparent, self-stabilizing mechanism that optimizes yield while preserving long-term liquidity health.
Mathematical Model (Conceptual Overview)
The Liquidity Responsive Wager Management Model (LRWMM) governs how wager limits are determined based on the size and health of the casino’s liquidity pool. Rather than relying on complex probability calculations, the model uses a set of intuitive financial parameters to decide how much of the available liquidity can safely be exposed to risk at any given time.
Liquidity Pool as the Risk Base In decentralized casinos, the liquidity pool represents the bankroll, the total capital available to cover payouts and sustain operations. The LRWMM continuously monitors this value and uses it as the foundation for calculating betting limits. When the liquidity pool grows, the system can safely allow larger wagers; when it shrinks, wager limits are automatically reduced. This keeps the casino solvent and self-balancing across market cycles.
Exposure Fraction (r) The model determines what portion of the pool can be at risk in any single wager or game round. This portion—called the exposure fraction (r)—is not fixed. It adjusts according to three main factors:
Volatility tolerance (V): Represents how aggressive or conservative the system should be.
A higher volatility tolerance means the system takes smaller risks per bet.
A lower volatility tolerance means it’s more aggressive.
Reserve ratio (R): Indicates what percentage of the total liquidity must remain untouched to preserve safety.
For example, if the reserve ratio is 80%, only 20% of the liquidity can ever be used for active wagering.
Confidence buffer (C): A small additional safety margin to account for short-term fluctuations in pool value or transaction timing issues.
Together, these ensure that wager sizes scale responsibly with liquidity while maintaining a safety margin against volatility.
Game-Specific Adjustment Each game has a maximum payout multiplier (M), the maximum amount a player could win from a single bet relative to their wager. The LRWMM reduces allowable exposure for games with higher multipliers.
For example:
A simple coin flip (2× payout) carries moderate risk.
A high-multiplier dice game (up to 990×) carries far greater tail risk.
To handle this, the model applies a risk adjustment that makes high-multiplier games consume a smaller portion of the liquidity pool per bet. This keeps the system’s total exposure balanced across all game types.
Dynamic Scaling with Liquidity Size The model also adapts to the overall size of the liquidity pool. As liquidity increases, the model becomes more conservative in relative terms, allowing smaller percentages of the total bankroll to be risked. This ensures stability and reduces volatility for larger pools.
Conversely, when the pool is small or newly bootstrapped, it can operate with slightly higher proportional risk to encourage growth and player engagement, while still maintaining reserve protections.
This automatic scaling makes the system self-stabilizing: it grows steadily without exposing the bankroll to catastrophic loss.
Wager Limit Output After applying all these adjustments, the model produces a maximum wager limit (wₘₐₓ). This is the largest single bet that can be placed at that moment, given the current liquidity and configuration values.
In practice:
The frontend displays this maximum limit to players dynamically.
The smart contract enforces it in real-time using live liquidity data from the pool.
This ensures consistency between user experience and on-chain risk management.
Example in practice Imagine a liquidity pool containing $1,000:
80% of that pool is held in reserve (only 20% available for risk).
The system’s volatility tolerance is set to “1.0” (neutral).
A 5% confidence buffer is applied.
The game is a simple 2× coin flip.
After adjusting for all factors, the model would allow roughly $130 to be placed as the largest possible single wager.
If the pool grows to $10,000, the maximum bet increases accordingly (around $1,300). If the pool falls to $500, the maximum bet automatically reduces (around $65).
The system therefore adjusts instantly with pool performance, no manual tuning required.
Why This Works By tying wager sizes directly to available liquidity and known parameters (risk tolerance, reserve ratio, payout multiplier), LRWMM guarantees:
Solvency: The pool cannot be drained by unlikely but extreme outcomes.
Consistency: Players always see fair, predictable wager limits that scale naturally with liquidity.
Automation: No external risk management is required; the system self-adjusts.
Transparency: All values are visible and verifiable on-chain.
This combination makes LRWMM a practical, on-chain alternative to the mathematically heavier Kelly criterion, optimizing for long-term sustainability and predictable growth.
Last updated